Watershed report cards are powerful tools used around the world to describe ecosystem status, increase public awareness, and inform decision makers. This is the first Clinton River Watershed Report Card, which assesses the condition of the river itself as well as the surrounding watershed. The development of a watershed report card is collaborative. Stakeholders from a variety of backgrounds—scientists, researchers, government officials, business owners, and interested civilians—come together to define what is valuable about an ecosystem and what threatens that value. The resulting report cards are “socioenvironmental” because they contain more than just environmental concerns. A river’s health is about more than its water quality and fish population; rivers have recreational and economic value to the people who live in their watersheds.
This report card is a timely, transparent assessment of the Clinton River and its watershed, which is the traditional land of the Odawa, Ojibwe, Potawatomi, and Wyandot peoples. This document was produced by the Clinton River Watershed Council and the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES). Funding was provided by the Fred A. and Barbara M. Erb Family Foundation. Council Fire, LLC was integral to developing economic indicators and consulted on economic data analysis. Over 100 stakeholders contributed to this project. To learn more about the Clinton River Watershed Council, visit crwc.org. All photos courtesy of the Clinton River Watershed Council.
Data sources include: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; Detroit Bird Alliance/Audubon Society; Federal Emergency Management Agency; Clinton River Watershed Council; Google Earth Engine; Implan; Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy; Michigan Department of Health and Human Services; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Water Quality Monitoring Council; Trust for Public Land; U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Geological Survey; and Your Economy. To find more information about the data and analyses used, please refer to the methods report.