EcoHealth Report Cards
  • About
  • The Process
  • Contact
  • Report Cards
    • Chesapeake Bay
    • Clinton River
    • Detroit River
    • Guanabara Bay
    • Huron River
    • Lake Erie
    • Long Island Sound
    • Maryland Coastal Bays
    • Orinoco River
    • Rio Grande
    • River Raisin
    • Rouge River
    • Southeast Michigan
    • Sudbury, Assabet, & Concord Rivers
    • Verde River
    • Willamette River

Chesapeake Bay

  • Home
  • Bay Health
  • Watershed Health
  • Indicators
    • Overall Health Index
    • Dissolved Oxygen
    • Nitrogen
    • Phosphorus
    • Turbidity
    • Water Quality Index
    • Chlorophyll a
    • Water Clarity
    • Aquatic Grasses
    • Benthic Community
    • Blue Crab
    • Bay Anchovy
    • Striped Bass
    • Protected Lands
    • Stewardship
    • Social Index
    • Walkability
    • Heat Vulnerability Index
    • Fish community
    • Median income
    • Housing affordability
    • Income inequality
    • Jobs growth
    • Environmental Justice Index
  • Bay Regions
    • Lower Eastern Shore
    • Choptank River
    • Upper Eastern Shore
    • Upper Western Shore
    • Patapsco and Back Rivers
    • Lower Western Shore
    • Patuxent River
    • Potomac River
    • Rappahannock River
    • York River
    • James River
    • Elizabeth River
  • Watershed Regions
    • Overall
    • Chemung
    • Choptank
    • Elizabeth
    • Juniata
    • Lower Eastern Shore
    • Lower James
    • Lower Potomac
    • Lower Susquehanna
    • Lower Western Shore
    • Middle James
    • Middle Potomac
    • Middle Susquehanna
    • Patapsco and Back
    • Patuxent
    • Rappahannock
    • Shenandoah
    • Upper Eastern Shore
    • Upper James
    • Upper Potomac
    • Upper Susquehanna
    • Upper Western Shore
    • West Branch Susquehanna
    • York
  • Issues
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007
    • 2006
  • Publications
  • Take Action
  • About
  1. Home
  2. Report Cards
  3. Chesapeake Bay
  4. Publications

Publications

2023/2024 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2023/2024 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed. Since 2016, UMCES has engaged stakeholders throughout the watershed to transform the report card into an evaluation of the Chesapeake Watershed health. Watershed health includes traditional ecological indicators, but also economic and societal indicators. This is the fifth year the watershed has been scored, and while no new indicators were included this year there were multiple updates to existing indicators. Linkages and relationships between the ecological, economic, and societal indicators will be evaluated in future report cards.

Overall, the Chesapeake Watershed scored 52%, a C. There were four ecological indicators, four economic indicators, and four societal indicators.

Overall, Chesapeake Bay scored 55%, a C+, in 2023, showing a significantly improving trend. This is the highest overall grade for the bay since 2002.

PDF Download PDF

2022 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2022 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed. Since 2016, UMCES has engaged stakeholders throughout the watershed to transform the report card into an evaluation of the Chesapeake Watershed health. Watershed health includes traditional ecological indicators, but also economic and societal indicators. This is the fourth year the watershed has been scored, and one new ecological indicator has been added. Linkages and relationships between the ecological, economic, and societal indicators will be evaluated in future report cards.

Overall, the Chesapeake Watershed scored 52%, a C. There were four ecological indicators, four economic indicators, and four societal indicators. This is the first year evaluating an Environmental Justice Index, though it is not included in the overall watershed health score.

Overall, Chesapeake Bay scored 51%, a C, in 2022, showing a significantly improving trend. While northern tributaries show improving trends, many tributaries scored poorly with no significant trends from the previous year.

PDF Download PDF

2021 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2021 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed. Since 2016, UMCES has engaged stakeholders throughout the watershed to transform the report card into an evaluation of the Chesapeake Watershed health. Watershed health includes traditional ecological indicators, but also economic and societal indicators. This is the third year the watershed has been scored, and four new economic indicators have been added. Linkages and relationships between the ecological, economic, and societal indicators will be evaluated in future report cards.

Overall, the Chesapeake Watershed scored 56%, a C+. There were three ecological indicators, four economic indicators, and four societal indicators.

Overall, Chesapeake Bay scored 50%, a C in 2021, which improved slightly since 2020. Long-term trends are still showing improvement for the overall Bay and four other regions, while one region is showing a declining trend.

PDF Download PDF

2020 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2020 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. Since 2016, UMCES has engaged stakeholders throughout the watershed to transform the report card into an evaluation of the Chesapeake Watershed health. Watershed health includes traditional ecosystem indicators, but also social, economic, and cultural indicators. This is the second year the watershed has been scored, and four new indicators have been added. Additional indicators are being researched for use in the next report card.

Overall, the Chesapeake Watershed scored 64%, a B-. There were four aquatic indicators, one terretrial indicator, and four societal indicators.

Overall, Chesapeake Bay scored 45% in 2020, which improved slightly since 2019. Despite low scores in 2020, long-term trends are still showing improvement.

PDF Download PDF

2019 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2019 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. For the first time the report card includes an assessment of the Chesapeake Watershed as well. In 2019, the report card includes seven Bay health indicators and five Watershed health indicators. In 2019, the overall score for Chesapeake Bay is a 44%, a C-. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Despite the decrease in score from 2018, overall bay health is slightly improving over time. Long term trends of each reporting region health are also presented. For its first ever score, the Chesapeake Watershed scored 60%, a B-. This means the Watershed is in good health.

PDF Download PDF

2018 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

2018 Chesapeake Bay & Watershed Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2018, the report card includes five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2018, the overall grade for Chesapeake Bay is a 46%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Despite the decrease in score from 2017, overall bay health is still significantly improving over time. Long term trends of each reporting region health and a fisheries index are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2017 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2017 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

The overall score for the Chesapeake Bay Health Index for 2017 was 54%, the same score as 2016. Bay-wide, dissolved oxygen continued to be the best scoring indicator with an 89% in 2017, an A. Aquatic grasses scored a C- (44%), improved from last year’s D+ (39%). Water clarity scored an F (17%), a decrease from last year’s D- (24%). Benthic community in the bay improved from a C (54%) to a B- (60%). Total nitrogen scored C+ (59%), an improvement from last year’s C+ (55%). Total phosphorus scored B+ (76%), declining from an A- (82%) in 2016. Chlorophyll a scored D+ (35%), the same as last year.

PDF Download PDF

2016 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2016 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2016, the report card includes five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2016, the overall grade for Chesapeake Bay is a 54%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Long term trends of each reporting region health and a fisheries index are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2015 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2015 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2015, the report card includes five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2015, the overall grade for Chesapeake Bay is a 53%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Long term trends of each reporting region health and a fisheries index are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2014 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2014 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2014, the report card includes five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2014, the overall grade for Chesapeake Bay is a 50%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. A fisheries index and climate change resilience index as well as trajectories of reporting region health are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2013 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2013 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2013, the report card includes five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2013, the overall grade for Chesapeake Bay is a 45%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Fisheries indicators as well as trajectories of reporting region health are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2012 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2012 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. In 2012, the methods for the report card have changed to include five water quality indicators and two biotic indicators. In 2012, the overall grade for ChesapeakeBay is a 47%, a C. This means the Bay is in moderate health. Fisheries indicators as well as trajectories of reporting region health are also presented.

PDF Download PDF

2011 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2011 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of Chesapeake Bay. The overall health of Chesapeake Bay, determined using water quality and biotic indicators, declined slightly in 2011. The overall grade of D+ was a decrease for the second year in a row, down from a C- in 2010. Only two reporting regions, the Patapsco and Back Rivers, and the Lower Western Shore (MD), had improved grades in 2011. The highest-ranked region for the second year in a row was the Upper Bay, with a grade of C.

PDF Download PDF

2010 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2010 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of 2010 Chesapeake Bay health. The overall health of Chesapeake Bay, assessed using water quality and biotic indicators, declined slightly in 2010. The overall grade decreased from a C in 2009 to C- in 2010. Only two reporting regions (James River and York River) had improved grades in 2010, three were unchanged, and nine declined. The highest-ranked region in previous years, the Upper Western Shore, decreased to fourth highest. The Upper Bay (C+) became the top-ranked region in 2010.

PDF Download PDF

2009 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2009 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of 2009 Chesapeake Bay habitat health. The overall health of Chesapeake Bay, assessed using water quality and biotic indicators, was the best it has been since 2002. The overall grade improved from C- in 2008 to C in 2009. Eight reporting regions had improved grades in 2009, four were unchanged, and two had slightly worse grades. The highest ranked region, for the third year in a row, was the Upper WesternShore (B-), while the lowest ranked region this year was the Patapsco and Back Rivers (F).

PDF Download PDF

2008 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2008 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed annual assessment of 2008 Chesapeake Bay habitat health. This is the third year that the report card has been released. This report card rates 15 reporting regions of the Bay using six indicators that are combined into a single overarching index of habitat health. The overall health of Chesapeake Bay was poor in 2008, obtaining a grade of C-. Health of the 15 individual reporting regions varied, ranging from B- (moderate-good) to F (very poor).

PDF Download PDF

2007 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2007 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed annual assessment of 2007 Chesapeake Bay habitat health. This is the second year that the report card has been released. This report card rates 15 reporting regions of the Bay using six indicators that are combined into a single overarching index of habitat health. Habitat health is defined as progress of the six indicators towards established scientifically derived ecological thresholds or goals. A low score therefore means that the region rarely meets the ecological threshold levels. A high score means that the region often meets the threshold levels.

PDF Download PDF

2006 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

2006 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

This report card provides a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed annual assessment of 2006 Chesapeake Bay habitat health. A report card will be released each year providing an assessment of the previous year’s habitat health. 2006 is the first year that the report card has been released. This report card rates 15 reporting regions of the Bay using six indicators that are combined into a single overarching index of habitat health. Habitat health is defined as progress of the six indicators towards established scientifically derived ecological thresholds or goals. A low score therefore means that the region rarely meets the ecological threshold levels. A high score means that the region often meets the threshold levels.

PDF Download PDF

© 2025 UMCES

  • Home
  • About
  • The Process
  • Contact
  • Report Cards
    • Chesapeake Bay
      • Bay Health
      • Watershed Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Turbidity
        • Water Quality Index
        • Chlorophyll a
        • Water Clarity
        • Aquatic Grasses
        • Benthic Community
        • Blue Crab
        • Bay Anchovy
        • Striped Bass
        • Protected Lands
        • Stewardship
        • Social Index
        • Walkability
        • Heat Vulnerability Index
        • Fish community
        • Median income
        • Housing affordability
        • Income inequality
        • Jobs growth
        • Environmental Justice Index
      • Bay Regions
        • Lower Eastern Shore
        • Choptank River
        • Upper Eastern Shore
        • Upper Western Shore
        • Patapsco and Back Rivers
        • Lower Western Shore
        • Patuxent River
        • Potomac River
        • Rappahannock River
        • York River
        • James River
        • Elizabeth River
      • Watershed Regions
        • Overall
        • Chemung
        • Choptank
        • Elizabeth
        • Juniata
        • Lower Eastern Shore
        • Lower James
        • Lower Potomac
        • Lower Susquehanna
        • Lower Western Shore
        • Middle James
        • Middle Potomac
        • Middle Susquehanna
        • Patapsco and Back
        • Patuxent
        • Rappahannock
        • Shenandoah
        • Upper Eastern Shore
        • Upper James
        • Upper Potomac
        • Upper Susquehanna
        • Upper Western Shore
        • West Branch Susquehanna
        • York
      • Issues
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
        • 2012
        • 2011
        • 2010
        • 2009
        • 2008
        • 2007
        • 2006
      • Publications
      • Take Action
      • About
    • Clinton River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Region
        • Clinton River
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Detroit River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Region
        • Detroit River Watershed
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Guanabara Bay
      • Bay Health
      • Basin Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Biological Oxygen Demand
        • Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen
        • Total Phosphorus
        • Orthophosphate
        • Turbidity
        • Fecal coliform
      • Sanitation
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Huron River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Region
        • Huron River
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Lake Erie
      • Lake Health
      • Watershed Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Total Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Phosphorus
        • Total Nitrogen
        • Nitrate + Nitrite
        • Chlorophyll a
        • Walleye
        • Yellow Perch
        • Emerald Shiner
        • Bloom Index
        • Source Water Toxin
        • Recreational Toxin
        • Total Suspended Solids
        • Fish
        • Macroinvertebrates
        • Habitat Quality
        • Fish Consumption
        • Pesticide
      • Lake Regions
        • Overall Lake
        • Northwest
        • Southwest
        • Maumee
        • Northeast
        • Eastern Islands
        • Sandusky Bay
      • Watershed Regions
        • Overall Watershed
        • Auglaize
        • Cedar/Portage
        • Detroit
        • Essex
        • Raisin/Huron
        • St. Joseph
        • St. Marys
        • Lower Maumee
        • Lower Thames
        • Sandusky
        • Tiffin
        • Upper Maumee
        • Upper Thames
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • Take Action
      • About
    • Long Island Sound
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Chlorophyll a
        • Water Clarity
        • Dissolved Organic Carbon
      • Regions
        • Overall
        • Western Narrows
        • Eastern Narrows
        • Western Basin
        • Central Basin
        • Eastern Basin
      • Issues
        • 2018
        • 2015
        • 2013
      • Publications
      • Take Action
      • About
    • Maryland Coastal Bays
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Chlorophyll a
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Seagrass
        • Hard Clams
      • Regions
        • Overall
        • Assawoman Bay
        • Chincoteague Bay
        • Isle of Wight Bay
        • Newport Bay
        • Sinepuxent Bay
        • St. Martin River
      • Issues
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
      • Publications
      • Take Action
      • About
    • Orinoco River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Water Quality Index
        • Risks to Water Quality
        • Water Supply and Demand
        • Natural Land Cover
        • Stable Forest Area
        • Terrestrial Connectivity
        • Fire Frequency
        • Ecosystem Services
        • Human Nutrition
        • Mining in Sensitive Ecosystems
        • River Dolphins
      • Regions
        • Arauca River
        • Atabapo River
        • Bita River
        • Guaviare River
        • Inírida River
        • Matavén River
        • Meta River
        • Tomo River
        • Tuparro River
        • Vichada River
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Rio Grande
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Annual low flow
        • Zero Flow Days
        • Municipal Water Supply
        • Groundwater
        • Agriculture surface water supply
        • Flow Alteration
        • Riparian Areas
        • Water Supply for Compact
        • Impaired Streams
        • Invasive Trees and Shrubs
        • Wetland Loss
        • Bird Diversity
        • Silvery Minnow
        • Native Fish Diversity
        • All Fish Diversity
        • Native peoples and acequias support
        • Native peoples and acequias representation
        • Water Resource Governance
        • Water Resource Management
        • Protected Lands
        • Fire
        • Park Visitation
        • Recreation Access
        • Cultural and Historical Places
        • Walkability
        • Heat Vulnerability Index
        • Social Vulnerability Index
        • Air Quality
        • Affordable Housing
      • Regions
        • Overall
        • Upper Rio Grande - CO
        • Upper Rio Grande - NM
        • Middle Rio Grande
        • Lower Rio Grande
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • River Raisin
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Region
        • River Raisin
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Rouge River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Region
        • Rouge River
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Southeast Michigan
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Household Income
        • Local Ownership
        • Cost of Flooding
        • Income Equality
        • Trade
        • River Economy
        • Wetlands
        • Tree Cover
        • Forests
        • Fish Populations
        • Bird Diversity
        • Benthic Community
        • Protected Lands
        • Fish Consumption
        • Bacteria
        • Heat Vulnerability
        • Air Quality Index
        • Environmental Justice
        • Flooding
        • Sewer Overflows
        • Impervious Surfaces
        • Farmland
        • Affordable Housing
        • Walkability
        • Parks
        • Beach Access
        • Watercraft Access
        • Fishing
        • Nitrogen
        • Phosphorus
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Water Temperature
        • Turbidity
      • Regions
        • Overall
        • Clinton
        • Detroit
        • Huron
        • Raisin
        • Rouge
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • About
    • Sudbury, Assabet, & Concord Rivers
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall
        • Dissolved Oxygen
        • Temperature
        • Suspended Solids
        • Phosphorus
        • Nitrogen
        • Floating Biomass
        • Streamflow Alteration
        • Groundwater Level
        • Summer Streamflow
        • Visual Quality
        • Cultural Importance
        • Impervious Cover
        • Aquatic Connectivity
        • Ecological Integrity
        • Passability
        • Access
        • Trails
        • Bacteria
        • Fish Edibility
      • Regions
        • Upper Sudbury River
        • Lower Sudbury River
        • Upper Assabet River
        • Lower Assabet River
        • Upper Concord River
        • Lower Concord River
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • Take Action
        • Discover your rivers
        • Roll up your sleeves
        • Become a citizen scientist or advocate
        • Celebrate success
      • About
    • Verde River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Base Flow
        • Surfacewater BMPs
        • Groundwater BMPs
        • Water Quality Index
        • Water Quality Certainty
        • Turbidity
        • Macroinvertebrates
        • Upland Condition Index
        • Riparian Birds
        • Fish
        • Recreation Planning
        • Visitor Satisfaction
        • Recreation Access
        • Civic Engagement
        • Digital Engagement
        • Healthcare
        • Education
        • Unemployment
        • Affordable Housing
      • Regions
        • Overall
        • Big and Little Chino
        • Upper Verde
        • Upper Verde Valley
        • Oak Creek
        • Lower Verde Valley
        • Wild and Scenic
        • Lower Verde
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • Take Action
      • About
    • Willamette River
      • Health
      • Indicators
        • Overall Health Index
        • Water Quality Index
        • Toxics
        • Temperature
        • Native Fish
        • Non-native Fish
        • Juvenile Chinook
        • Bald Eagle
        • Channel Complexity
        • Floodplain Forest
        • Flow Targets
        • Peak Flows
        • Fish Consumption Advisories
        • Tribal Fisheries
        • Fecal Bacteria
        • Harmful Algal Blooms
      • Regions
        • Upper Willamette
        • Middle Willamette
        • Lower Willamette
      • Issues
      • Publications
      • Take Action
        • Know your river
        • Make a change
        • Join the movement
        • Celebrate success
      • About